I retained Dana Earle for representation in a criminal matter. Throughout the case، I was repeatedly told there was “no victim” and that the case was weak. Despite those assurances، the charges increased from two counts to seven. Depositions were started but not completed. Two depositions were only partially conducted and were never finished، despite being scheduled to continue. Critical pretrial preparation did not occur. Approximately 35 days before docket sounding، I was informed she would be taking time off. During that period، I did not receive meaningful preparation، strategy، or motion practice. No substantive pretrial motions were filed on my behalf. Motions I drafted myself were repeatedly postponed and never filed. During two meetings، she referenced what appeared to be another client’s file، creating confusion and concern. At one point she told me how much she liked the State Attorney، that he was “a nice guy.” In open court she told the Judge how communicative the SA was and how he was great to work with. That same SA failed to mention he was issuing warrants on 5 additional charges and he spoke to he the day prior. Nearly two years and Dana did absolutely nothing except for make it nearly impossible for another attorney to help me. Anyone facing serious criminal charges should ensure their attorney is actively preparing، completing depositions، filing substantive motions، and developing a clear defense strategy. I would highly recommend not using Dana Earle for cousel.
